The court evangelical Franklin Graham remains loyal to Trump amid the House of Representative impeachment inquiry. Today Yonat Shimron of Religion News Service spoke with Graham. Rather than addressing the fact that the President of the United States called a foreign power to tell him to dig up dirt on the president’s political rival, Graham did what most court evangelicals do when Donald Trump is trouble. First, he changed the subject. Second, he engaged in fear-mongering.
Instead of addressing the problems with Trump’s phone call, Graham described it as a “distraction” and called for the investigation of Joe and Hunter Biden. Actually, it is Graham who is doing the distracting here.
Graham also told Shimron that he is concerned that Hunter Biden is using cocaine. See what the court evangelical is doing here. The mention of cocaine is a dog whistle. Graham is betting that no conservative evangelical would ever vote for a candidate whose son uses cocaine. Shame on Graham! No pastor or true evangelical leader would relish in the fact that Hunter Biden has struggled with drug addiction. Graham is sacrificing Christian charity and compassion for political gain.
Here is a taste of Shimron’s piece:
Graham’s defense of the president echoed that of fellow evangelical Robert Jeffress, pastor of First Baptist Church Dallas, who has warned of a potential civil war if the House votes on impeachment and who has accused Democrats of worshipping the pagan god Moloch.
Sounding the alarm about a nation in peril is a tried-and-true evangelical strategy, said John Fea, professor of American history at Messiah College in Mechanicsburg, Pennsylvania.
“I’ve argued this has been a typical part of evangelical political engagement for centuries — fear mongering,” said Fea. “You can’t make an argument to support what the president did on his phone call with the Ukrainian president. So what do you do? You play the traditional game of instilling fear in the electorate so they will see us falling off the cliff as a nation and this apocalyptic language will convince them they have to vote for Trump again in 2020.”
Read the entire piece here.
Sometimes I wonder if this kind of loyalty to corrupt presidents is part of the Graham family DNA. As Shimron notes in her piece, Billy Graham (Franklin’s father) also stood behind Richard Nixon to the very end. Here is Billy Graham biographer Grant Wacker:
Graham possessed boundless admiration for Nixon. In the 1968 contest between Nixon and Senator Hubert Humphrey, as in the 1960 race between Nixon and Kennedy, Graham did not issue a formal or explicit endorsement of Nixon, but he made no attempt to camouflage his views either. One week before the election the press reported that Nixon’s name was on Graham’s absentee ballot…
The relationship continued to thicken….Honor Billy Graham Day in Charlotte on October 15, 1971, won another visit from the president. Some felt that Nixon’s remarks about Graham that day crossed the line from honor to adulation. Less than a month before the 1972 presidential election, Graham declared on the Merv Griffin Show: “Nixon is the most able and the best trained man for the job probably in American history. In an election year that divides people…I [have] to be honest.
These events form the context in which Graham’s reaction to Nixon’s role in the Watergate controversy should be framed. The details of the low-level crime and high-level mendacity that led to Nixon’s impeachment and forced his resignation in August 1974 have been rehearsed many times and need not detain us. The crucial point is that Graham continued to defend Nixon long after most Americans smelled a rat. When the first hint of something amiss came to light in 1972, Graham dismissed it as pettifogery. He pointed out that illicit undercover behavior was no stranger to the White House. Through 1972 Graham allowed that the Watergate events themselves were troubling but insisted that Nixon had nothing to do with them. As late as December he privately assured Nixon of his personal affection and “complete confidence in your personal integrity./” Graham maintained that posture through January 1974.
Finally, on April 29, 1974, the House Judiciary Committee received 1,200 pages of transcripts of Oval Office conversations. They showed that Nixon had participated in the cover-up virtually from the outset. The transcripts also showed Nixon’s capacity for vulgarity and profanity. Graham finally muscled up the courage to start reading New York Times excerpts in the middle of May. “The think that surprised me and shook me most was the vulgar language he used…I felt physically sick.” Elsewhere Graham admitted to weeping and throwing up. Graham biographer Marshall Frady said Graham attributed Nixon’s fall to “sleeping pills and demons.” Graham insisted he was misquoted. But he was prepared to say that “all of Watergate was demonic because…it caused the American people to lose confidence in its institutions….almost as though some supernatural power of evil was trying to destroy this country.
Graham’s reference to Nixon’s language left many journalists and historians appalled. They felt Graham had proved incapable of distinguishing between the minor issue of cussing and the major one of undermining the government. On the face of it they were right….
Graham’s entanglement with Nixon marked a turning point. Until 1974 Graham had tumbled more and more rapidly into the vortex of partisan politics. When Nixon crashed, his muddy reputation soiled Graham’s. The Nixon years represented the bottom of Graham’s slide. Graham acknowledged that Nixon’s magnetism had clouded his judgment. In 1993 he would say, simply, that his friendship with Nixon had “muffled those inner monitors that had warned me for years to stay out of partisan politics. He urged young evangelists to avoid his mistake…