We have done a few posts already on Masterpiece Cakeshop vs. Colorado Civil Rights Commission.
According to a recent piece by Kate Shellnut at Christianity Today, a 2016 Pew survey found that 35% of white evangelicals support same-sex marriage, while 44% of black Protestants support same-sex marriage.
Only 22% of white evangelicals favor requiring businesses to serve same-sex weddings. 46% of black Protestants favor this.
Notice that the survey compares white EVANGELICALS with black PROTESTANTS, so the comparison does not tell us as much as we think it does. (Although it is also fair to say that a large number of black Protestants are evangelical in theology). Nevertheless, it is clear that African-Americans are more than open to same sex marriage than are white evangelicals.
Shellnut asked four African-American Christian leaders to reflect on the Masterpiece case. They are:
Charles Watson of the Baptist Joint Committee for Religious Liberty
Lisa Robinson, editor of Kaleoscope blog
Kathryn Freeman, director of public policy for the Christian Life Commission of the Baptist General Convention of Texas
Justin Giboney, founder of the AND Campaign
Here is Robinson:
As an African American woman, it might seem reasonable for me to have qualms about the recent ruling the Supreme Court delivered in support of a Christian baker. Jack Phillips’s refusal to serve these individuals smacks of the same kind of infringement that African Americans in this country experienced. However, three factors give me pause in this line of thinking and lead me to applaud the Supreme Court’s decision.
First, the case is not about discrimination, but religious conscience. The civil rights movement was started because a whole class of people were pervasively denied acceptance based on who they were biologically. Discrimination ensued because they weren’t deemed to be fit to share the same services, space, or civic obligations in a white society.
The Masterpiece Cakeshop case wasn’t about the people, but the ceremony. I think likening the two cases—discrimination against blacks and denial of cake-baking for a ceremony—undermines the cause of the civil rights movement, which was about affirming the dignity of personhood irrespective of lifestyle choices.
I can appreciate arguments that say whites believed upholding the purity of races was rooted in their Christian convictions; however, the racist line of thinking that prevailed for so long has no basis in Scripture (consider the marriages of Solomon and Moses), whereas endorsing same-sex marriage is explicitly prohibited.
Second, reliance on state-sanctioned intervention can have negative implications for how we value fellow image bearers apart from their choices. I confess that I have a love-hate perspective toward the governmental intervention needed to address discrimination against African Americans. Unfortunately, we ultimately had to rely the state to define discrimination rather than God himself and his requirements for what kind of activity his people should or should not support.
Lastly, equating refusal to participate in same-sex ceremonies with active discrimination against a class of people puts us in a precarious position of lending support to same-sex marriage because we don’t want to reject people. We ought to be free to distinguish between the value of persons and the values they espouse. At the end of the day, commitment to Christian convictions matters most.
Read the entire piece here.