Carly Fiorina, Ted Cruz’s prospective running mate in 2016, is voting for Joe Biden in 2020

ap_16118748984473

Here is Edward Isaac-Dovere at The Atlantic:

Republicans who say Donald Trump should lose in November but insist they won’t vote for Joe Biden aren’t being honest, Carly Fiorina argues.

Fiorina was a Republican candidate for president just four years ago, and was briefly Ted Cruz’s prospective running mate. Trump needs to go, she says—and that means she’s voting for Biden.

Fiorina is not going to keep quiet, write in another candidate, or vote third-party. “I’ve been very clear that I can’t support Donald Trump,” she told me, in an interview that can be heard in full on the latest episode of The Ticket. “And elections are binary choices.” She struggled with the decision, and whether to go public. But she said that this struggle is one Republicans need to have—including those who have rationalized supporting Trump despite their disagreements, because of some of his policies or judicial appointments.

Listen to the interview here.

What If Cruz Makes a Third-Party Run?

US-VOTE-REPUBLICANS-DEBATE

Noah Millman of The Week is asking this question.  Here is a taste:

Moreover, if you were still trying to woo enough delegates to win outright, why would you announce your VP choice now? At the convention, that very choice could be the prize that nets you precious delegates from the Marco Rubio or Kasich corner, as well as their admirers among the uncommitted.

So what are you up to?

Well, if Trump is really unacceptable to true conservatives, then presumably true conservatives shouldn’t vote for him, even at the risk of electing Hillary Clinton. And if Trump is really an unprecedentedly dangerous person to elect president — because of his temperament, his blithe ignorance, or his manifest insincerity — then nobody should vote for him, regardless of their ideology.

And if either or both of those things are true, then neither should you. Or your supporters.

The Cruz campaign set out to redeem the Republican Party from its pusillanimous pessimists and appeasers, the very people who are now prepared to pussyfoot with Trump in the hopes of achieving some semblance of party unity. But what if they can’t achieve unity that way at all — because if they try, you’ll free Cruz-Fiorina 2016 from the party?

Read his entire article here.

Some of you may have seen the comments Cruz levied against Trump earlier today. It is clear that he hates Trump.  He called him “amoral,” a “narcissist,” a “pathological liar.” And that was the mild stuff.  Cruz will also not say he will support Trump if he is the GOP nominee.

Is it possible that Cruz sees Trump as a greater evil than Hillary Clinton?  If he does, is it out of the question that he and Fiorina will make a third-party run that would ultimately hand Hillary the presidency?

If Cruz’s loses tonight in Indiana I am not sure he will exit quietly.

Actually, Carly Fiorina, What You Said About Hillary IS An Exxageration


Here is Carly from last night’s debate:


Imagine a Clinton presidency. Our military will continue to deteriorate. Our veterans will not be cared for. And, no, Mrs. Clinton, that situation is not exaggerated. The rich will get richer. The poor will get poorer. The middle class will continue to get crushed.
And as bad as that picture is, what’s even worse is that a Clinton presidency will corrode the character of this nation. Why? Because of the Clinton way: Say whatever you have to, lie as long as you can get away with it.
We must beat Hillary Clinton. Carly Fiorina can beat Hillary Clinton. I will beat Hillary Clinton. And under a President Fiorina, we will restore the character of this nation, the security of this nation, the prosperity of this nation, because as citizens, we will take our government back.
She definitely know how to play to the GOP base.

Will Carly Fiorina’s Medieval History Degree Help Her Fight ISIS?

The GOP presidential candidate is taking a lot of heat for saying that her study of medieval history as an undergraduate at Stanford will help her fight terrorism as president of the United States. 

At a town hall meeting in Windham, New Hampshire Fiorina said: “Finally my degree in medieval history and philosophy has come in handy because what ISIS wants to do is drive us back to the Middle Ages, literally.”

First of all, it is impossible for ISIS to literally drive us back to the Middle Ages unless they are able to engage in time travel.  But I digress.

Fiorina continued: “Every single one of the techniques that ISIS is using, the crucifixion, the beheadings, the burning alive, those were commonly used techniques in the Middle Ages, so we can’t avert our eyes and pretend it’s an exaggeration that ISIS wants to take its territory back to the Middle Ages but that is in truth what they want to do and are attempting to do.”

I am not a medieval historian so I do not know just how comparable these medieval “techniques” are to the techniques ISIS is using today, but I am willing to admit that they are similar.  I am also more than willing to say that the study of history can help us make sense of the present.  I think more presidential candidates need to study history.  I am also willing to say that the study of the past could provide understanding about ISIS that could aid in its defeat.  So in a lot of ways, Fiorina should be applauded for invoking her study of history.  But I think that there are some serious problems with the way she invokes it.

I could riff on this myself, but I think I will get a real medieval historian take it from here.  David Perry teaches teaches medieval history at Dominican University in River Forest, Illinois.  Here is a taste of his recent piece at The Guardian titled “No, Carly Fiorina, a degree in medieval history doesn’t qualify you to fight Isis.



I’d like to state unequivocally that my years of training to become a professor of medieval history in no way make me fit to be appointed commander-in-chief of the US military. While the Middle Ages do in fact shape contemporary events all the time, Fiorina unfortunately almost always gets the lessons of history wrong.

When we use the word “medieval” to characterize something we don’t like, be it Isis, the Ferguson Police department or Russia’s driver’s license regulations, we are trying to impose chronological distance between ourselves and things we find unpleasant. Thinking of these distasteful or evil aspects of the modern world as belonging to the past makes it harder, not easier, to understand their root causes and fight them.

That hasn’t stopped Fiorina from bringing up her medieval history training surprisingly often. It used to just be part of her “self-made” mythology: she graduated from Stanford with a degree that taught her how to think, but no specific skills, dropped out of law school, then clawed her way to the top.
The veracity of that story has been called into question, but she does make good points about the value of a humanities education, saying: “My medieval history and philosophy degree … did prepare me for life … I learned how to condense a whole lot of information down to the essence. That thought process has served me my whole life … I’m one of these people who believes we should be teaching people music, philosophy, history, art”. I wish more of her Republican colleagues would take these words to heart.
Lately, though, it’s all about scoring partisan points. She’s incorporated her quip about Isis driving us back to the Middle Ages as a standard part of her stump speech since at least last March. It’s a joke, perhaps, but given that her complete lack of national security credentials is a campaign issue, it’s not a throwaway line. She really does seem to be claiming that her undergraduate degree will enable her to make sound foreign policy decisions, despite her lack of experience.

Perry concludes his piece by suggesting a few things that the study of the Middle Ages should teach us today:

If Carly Fiorina really wants to draw on the Middle Ages for inspiration, I do have some suggestions. Lesson one: support universities, scholars, writers and artists, as their contributions outlive us all. Lesson two: peasants, oppressed for too long, always rebel. Lesson three: don’t go to war in the Middle East without a good exit plan.

Who Scored Big Last Night With Conservative Evangelicals?

Some of you remember the first Republican presidential debate when Megyn Kelly from Fox News asked the candidates (it was actually a question from a viewer on Facebook) if any of them had “received a word from God” about how they would conduct their presidency should they be elected in November 2016.

God was invoked constantly in the Fox News debate.  But God was rarely mentioned in last night’s GOP debate.  Unlike Kelly and the folks at Fox, Jake Tapper and his fellow questioners at CNN did not find the topic particularly interesting.

And for whatever reason, the candidates themselves rarely invoked God in their answers.  John Kasich did try to make an appeal to the “Judeo-Christian” heritage of Western Civilization, but he got no traction.   Tapper quickly moved on to another line of questioning.  Huckabee got some time to discuss Kim Davis, but it didn’t last long.

Going into the debate, many political pundits predicted that Huckabee, Cruz, Carson, and Kasich would make strong efforts to secure the votes of evangelicals.  But without any questions related to God or the Bible, it was difficult for these candidates to show their true religious colors.

Having said that,  there was one moment when the candidates did have the opportunity to connect with evangelical GOP voters.  It came during the discussion of the “defunding” of Planned Parenthood.  Nearly all the candidates (or at least those who were asked) want to stop funding the organization that was at the center of a series of disturbing videos about the selling of infant body parts. But it was Carly Fiorina, a candidate who is not particularly known for being a darling of the Christian Right, who seized the day:

Whatever you think of what Fiorina said or the accuracy of what she said, this was a brilliant political move.  Fiorina may be around for a while.