John Inazu, a law professor at Washington University and the author of Confident Pluralism: Surviving and Thriving Among Deep Differences, has weighed in on Princeton Theological Seminary’s decision to rescind the Kuyper Prize from evangelical Presbyterian minister Tim Keller. Get some background on this story here. Inazu raises some interesting questions in his post at the website … Continue reading Confident Pluralism, Princeton Seminary, and Tim Keller
In his March 2017 Christianity Today cover story, conservative writer Rod Dreher introduces evangelicals to “The Benedict Option.” I like Dreher’s published works. I read his book Crunchy Cons at a time in my intellectual journey when I was also reading a lot of Wendell Berry, Christopher Lasch, and others writing about the importance of … Continue reading The “Benedict Option” Versus “Confident Pluralism”
I have been reading Washington University law professor John D. Inazu‘s challenging and refreshing book Confident Pluralism: Surviving and Thriving through Deep Difference (University of Chicago Press, 2016). Here is a passage from the Introduction that really hit me between the eyes: Wellesley College, an all-women’s school, now confronts internal challenges around its growing transgender student population. … Continue reading Confident Pluralism
I am looking forward to reading and possibly reviewing John Inazu‘s new book, Confident Pluralism: Surviving and Thriving Through Deep Difference (University of Chicago Press, 2016). If Inazu’s argument in the book is anything like his recent piece with Tim Keller at the Christianity Today website, I think I am going to enjoy it. Here is … Continue reading Confident Pluralism
Portland, Oregon How do we live with one another despite our deepest differences? Over at The Hedgehog Review, Washington University law professor John Inazu introduces us to “confident pluralism.” He writes:Confident pluralism insists [that] our shared existence is not only possible, but necessary. Instead of the elusive goal of E pluribus unum (“Out of many, one”), confident pluralism suggests … Continue reading Confident Pluralism
Over at First Things, church historian Carl Trueman argues that Christian colleges need to prepare financially for a bleak future in a post-Christian age. He writes: The specific point of conflict is likely to be (once again) Title IX legislation that prohibits sexual discrimination at any institution of higher education receiving federal funding. The law does … Continue reading What Looms on the Horizon for Christian Colleges?
It is a disaster for all the reasons Chris Gehrz makes clear in his post today at The Pietist Schoolman. (I should add the title of this post is mine). The so-called “Nashville Statement” is indeed “theology for the Age of Trump.” I don’t really have much to add to Gerhz’s post. I encourage … Continue reading The Nashville Statement is a Disaster
Alternative title for this post: “The heroes of Rod’s book are almost all monks.” David Brooks has reviewed Rod Dreher’s The Benedict Option. Here is a taste: Rod is pre-emptively surrendering when in fact some practical accommodation is entirely possible. Most Americans are not hellbent on destroying religious institutions. If anything they are spiritually hungry … Continue reading Answering “Secular Purism” With “Religious Purism”
Are American Christians being persecuted for their faith? I am not sure persecution is the right word. No one is coming into the homes of Christians with weapons threatening to kill them if they do not publicly denounce their faith. But if this was happening, wouldn’t it be a good thing? Didn’t Jesus say “Blessed … Continue reading The Benedict Option and Christian “Persecution” in America
A few things online that caught my attention this week: Historian Mark Lilla talks with NPR about identity politics. Islamism, Trumpism, and the politics of meaning Who is this? Trump and Tammany Hall David Ochinsky reviews Steven Hahn, A Nation Without Borders: The United States and It’s World in the Age of the Civil War, … Continue reading Sunday Night Odds and Ends
Christianity Today’s website has published a statement, signed by Christian, Muslim, and Jewish leaders, opposing a bill sitting before the California State Senate that will essentially punish religious colleges that uphold traditional views of human sexuality. Here is the statement, in full: The California Assembly has proposed legislation that is harmful to the free exercise … Continue reading Religious Leaders Oppose California Senate Bill 1146
A lot. Some evangelicals will never vote for Hillary Clinton. She is connected to Barack Obama. She supports a women’s right to choose. She promises to appoint Supreme Court justices that will undermine religious liberty. She is married to Bill Clinton, a man who cheated on her in the White House and was impeached. She … Continue reading What Would It Take for Anti-Trump Evangelicals to Vote for Hillary Clinton?
He penned an op-ed for Religion News Service. I think this may be one of those primary source documents that will soon be assigned in American religious history courses. It also may be another reason why some of us will miss Obama. By the way, when Obama says that the founders defended religious liberty, but … Continue reading In Case You Missed What Obama Said at the Islamic Center of Baltimore