Write a paper responding to one of the readings on education (by Stanley Hauerwas or John Henry Newman or Ernest Boyer). Choose one point / claim / argument in the reading you choose, and respond to it using the one of the following invention processes: agree-disagree or define by qualifying or amplifying a point.
Since this is a designated writing course, I spend more time with each essay than I would in an average history course. After I returned the papers to the students on Friday, I took a few minutes to address some common mistakes:
- Read the paper aloud. If a sentence sounds awkward to the ear consider rewriting it. Even better, read the paper to someone else.
- The real work of writing begins on the second or third draft.
- Active voice
- When a sentence ends with a quote, the period goes inside the quotation marks.
- If a sentence is longer than three lines it is probably too long. There is nothing wrong with short sentences.
- Avoid phrases like “I believe” or “I feel.” Just say it. For example, some students write: “I really feel Ernest Boyer is right about community and I truly believe we should work harder at implementing his vision at Messiah College.” Just say “Ernest Boyer is right about community and we should work harder at implementing his vision at Messiah College.”
- Don’t put too much bibliographical information in a sentence. Avoid sentences like this: “Ernest Boyer, on page 17, paragraph 7 of the CCC Reader edited by Jim LaGrand, says….” This is why we have citations.
- After the instructor returns a paper the student should read everything he or she writes on it. If a professor puts a lot of red ink on a paper it is because he or she wants to help the student become a better writer.