Matthew Loftus is a family doctor who works at hospital for women and children in South Sudan. He is pro-life and believes that Donald Trump will do more to harm the pro-life movement than Hillary Clinton.
Here is a piece he published today at the conservative The Federalist:
If Hillary Clinton is taking shots at the culture of life from the outside, Donald Trump is a rot poisoning us from the inside. Any time he has spoken about abortion (which is not often, indicating how unimportant the cause is to him), he has only managed to embarrass the pro-life cause by associating himself with it. Some have suggested that Trump will be held in check or redirected by the “good people” he has surrounded himself with. But he has only managed to corrupt and debase those associated with him. He talks about “the evangelicals” like a pimp who owns them. In turn, far too many pro-lifers have acted like the Biblical character of Oholibah, who prostituted herself to pagan political powers in exchange for protection.
The most pro-life argument for Donald Trump revolves around his promise to appoint conservative Supreme Court justices, who would at some point find some way to overturn Roe v. Wade. But in the words of Leon Wolf, “If you believe that Trump has actual pro-life principles or that he will honor any sort of pledge to only appoint pro-life justices, then you have to be one of the most monumental suckers who has ever lived.” Trump’s promises to the pro-life movement are as worthless as a Trump University degree or one of his previous marriage contracts. There is simply no pro-life case for Trump.
But even in the best-case scenario, where Trump does win and does appoint a Supreme Court justice or two that’s favorable to the pro-life cause, his foolish antics will undoubtedly punish down-ballot Republicans in the next few election cycles (assuming that they aren’t battered hard enough this November). With Trump as the de facto standard bearer for the pro-life movement, any anti-abortion measures will have to overcome the gravitational force of his sleaziness to get anywhere. Despite claims that Trump would be a life preserver for the pro-life movement, he is a millstone around our neck. The only way to survive is to let go and keep swimming.
Read the entire piece here.
John’s article here is about abortion. That is the topic. There is no other issue. Attack your own church and kindly leave me out of it.
I’m sure Dr. Fea will enjoy the “idolatry” angle.
LikeLike
I think a very convincing case can be made that Gary Johnson would appoint Justices that would run in the same vein as an Alito. If so, does that make the Pro-life vote for Trump a moot point?
LikeLike
Unless of course you don’t wear blinders and using your intellectual capacity see that there are a lot more issues than just abortion.
Then again, one can also do what the GOP has done for a long time which is to run their mouths about abortion and not use their power to eliminate it in order to use it as a cover to attack women’s rights as well as a moral cover for their own hypocrisy on other issues.
LikeLike
Superbly thought-through and -written essay. Thank you for posting it.
LikeLike
Once again the truth hides in plain sight. Last night, Hillary’s disgusting defense of late-term abortions made this opposition to Trump moot. There is no black and white when it comes to late-term abortion, which according to Gallup a wide majority of Americans oppose.
http://www.nationalreview.com/article/441276/hillary-clinton-partial-birth-abortion-defending-indefensible
LikeLike